Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients (≥60 years) with AML: changing everything to change nothing?
Martínez-Cuadrón, David; Serrano, Josefina; Gil, Cristina; Tormo, Mar; Martínez-Sánchez, Pilar; Pérez Simón, José A.; García-Boyero, Raimundo; Rodríguez-Medina, Carlos; López-Pavía, María; Benavente, Celina; Bergua, Juan; Lavilla Rubira, Esperanza; Amigo, María L.; Herrera, Pilar; Alonso Domínguez, Juan M.; Bernal, Teresa; Colorado, Mercedes; Sayas, María J; Algarra, Lorenzo; Vidriales, María B; Rodríguez-Macías, Gabriela; Susana, Vives; Pérez Encinas, Manuel Mateo; López, Aurelio; Noriega Concepción, Victor; García-Fortes, María; Ramos, Fernando; Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Juan I.; Costilla-Barriga, Lisette; Labrador, Jorge; Boluda, Blanca; Rodríguez-Veiga, Rebeca; Martínez López, Joaquín; Sanz, Miguel A.; Montesinos, Pau
Identificadores
Identificadores
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Data de publicación
2021-06Título da revista
Leukemia
Tipo de contido
Artigo
DeCS
pronóstico | protocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada | estudios de seguimiento | estudios retrospectivos | leucemia mieloide aguda | tasa de supervivenciaMeSH
Prognosis | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute | Follow-Up Studies | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | Survival Rate | Retrospective StudiesCIE
Leucemia mieloide agudaResumo
[EN] There are no studies analyzing how therapeutic changes impact on outcomes of older AML patients. This study analyzes patient´s and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of 3637 AML patients aged ≥60 years reported to the PETHEMA registry. Study periods were 1999-2006 (before hypomethylating agents-HMAs availability) vs 2007-2013, and treatments were intensive chemotherapy (IC), non-intensive, clinical trial (CT), and supportive care only (SC). Median age was 72 (range, 60-99), 57% male, median ECOG 1 (range, 0-4), secondary AML 914 (30%), with adverse-risk genetic in 720 (32%). Treatment differed between study periods (1999-2006 vs 2007-2013): IC 58% vs 32%, non-intensive 1 vs 23%, CT 0 vs 2%, SC 27 vs 28% (p < 0.001). Median OS was 4.7 months (1-year OS 29% and 5-years 7%, without differences between periods), 1.2 for SC, 7.8 for non-intensive, 8.6 for IC, and 10.4 for CT (p < 0.001). OS improved in the 2007-2013 period for IC patients (10.3 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.004), but worsened for SC patients (1.2 vs 1.6 months, p = 0.03). Our real-life study shows that, despite evolving treatment for elderly patients during the last decade, OS has remained unchanged. Epidemiologic registries will critically assess whether novel therapies lead to noteworthy advances in the near future (#NCT02606825).










