O repositorio dixital RUNA

    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Galego 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Login
RUNABibliosaúdeXunta de galicia. Consellería de sanidadeServicio Galego de saúde
  • REPOSITORIO
  • SOBRE NÓS
    • Sobre RUNA
    • Normativa
    • Política Sergas
  • AXUDA
    • Axuda
    • FAQ
  •   RUNA Principal
  • Publicación científica
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Quality of life after liver transplantation. A systematic review

Tomé Martínez de Rituerto, Santiago; Wells, Jennifer T.; Said, Adnan; Lucey, Michael R.
Thumbnail
Estatísticas
Estatísticas
Ver Estatísticas de uso
Identificadores
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/23084
PMID: 18279999
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.12.013
ISSN: 0168-8278
Rexistro completo
Servizos
Servizos
RISMendeleyLinksolver
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
J Hepatol. 2008 Apr;48(4):567-77 (213.7Kb)
VERSIÓN DEL EDITOR (63.31Kb)
Data de publicación
2008-04
Título da revista
Journal of Hepatology
Tipo de contido
Artigo
DeCS
trasplante de hígado | calidad de vida | fracaso hepático | período postoperatorio
MeSH
Liver Transplantation | Quality of Life | Liver Failure | Postoperative Period
Resumo
[EN] Background/aims: Although many studies have reported significant improvements in quality of life (QOL) after liver transplantation (LT), consistent data on areas of improvement are lacking. To perform a systematic review on medical literature of QOL after LT paying particular attention to studies that utilized the most commonly adopted study instrument, Short Form-36 (SF-36). Methods: To collect studies focused on QOL in adult LT recipients, from 1963 to 2007, cited in Pub Med, Embase or Cochrane databases. From an initial identification of 613 articles, we selected 44 longitudinal studies with pre- and post-LT data that we assessed using a sign test, and 19 used SF-36, which we analyzed separately. Results: Longitudinal data showed remarkable improvement of common domains of QOL comparing pre- and post-transplant items. However, analysis of 16 SF-36 cross-sectional studies comparing post-LT patient domains with control population showed significantly higher ratings for controls in six while no differences were found in two. Conclusions: This review suggests that whereas general QOL improves after LT, when compared with healthy controls, LT recipients have significant deficits in QOL. Consequently, the previously reported QOL benefits after LT may have been overstated.

Navega

Todo RUNAColecciónsCentrosAutoresTítulosDeCSMeSHCIETipo de contidoEsta colecciónCentrosAutoresTítulosDeCSMeSHCIETipo de contido

Estatísticas

Ver Estatísticas de uso

DE INTERESE

Sobre Acceso AbertoDereitos de autor
TwitterRSS
Xunta de Galicia
© Xunta de Galicia. Información mantida e publicada na internet pola Consellería de Sanidade o Servizo Galego de Saúde
Aviso legal | RSS
Galicia