Staging and managing patients with acromegaly in clinical practice: baseline data from the SAGIT (R) validation study
Identificadores
Identificadores
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Data de publicación
2019Título da revista
Pituitary
Tipo de contido
Artigo
DeCS
factor I de crecimiento insulinoide | anciano | proyectos piloto | mediana edad | humanos | acromegalia | adulto | hormona del crecimiento humanaMeSH
Adult | Middle Aged | Insulin-Like Growth Factor I | Humans | Pilot Projects | Human Growth Hormone | Aged | AcromegalyResumo
PURPOSE: The SAGIT(R) instrument, designed to assist clinicians to stage acromegaly, assess treatment response and adapt patient management, was well received by endocrinologists in a pilot study. We report an interim analysis of baseline data from the validation phase. METHODS: The SAGIT(R) validation study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02539927) is an international, non-interventional study. Data collection included: demographic/disease characteristics; medical/surgical histories; concomitant acromegaly treatments; investigators' subjective evaluation of disease-control status (clinical global evaluation of disease control [CGE-DC]; controlled/not controlled/yet to be clarified) and clinical disease activity (active/not active); growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels; investigators' therapeutic decision. RESULTS: Of 228 patients enrolled, investigators considered disease to be controlled in 110 (48.2%), not controlled in 105 (46.1%), and yet to be clarified in 13 (5.7%) according to CGE-DC. Thirty-three patients were treatment-naive (not controlled, n = 31; yet to be clarified, n = 2). Investigators considered 48.2% patients in the controlled and 95.2% in the not-controlled groups to have clinically active disease. In the controlled group, 29.7% of patients did not exhibit hormonal control (GH </= 2.5 microg/L; normalized IGF-1) and 47.3% did not have rigorous hormonal control (GH < 1.0 microg/L; normalized IGF-1) by contemporary consensus. Current acromegaly treatment was continued with no change for 91.8% of patients in the controlled and 40.0% in the not-controlled groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight discrepancies between investigator-evaluated disease-control status, disease activity, hormonal control, and treatment decisions in acromegaly. Once validated, the SAGIT(R) instrument may assist clinicians in making active management decisions for patients with acromegaly.