What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II)

Dietrich, C.; Arcidiacono, P.; Braden, B.; Burmeister, S.; Carrara, S.; Cui, X.; Leo, M.; Dong, Y.; Fusaroli, P.; Gottschalk, U.; Healey, A.; Hocke, M.; Hollerbach, S.; Iglesias García, Julio; Ignee, A.; Jürgensen, C.; Kahaleh, M.; Kitano, M.; Kunda, R.; Larghi, A.; Möller, K.; Napoleon, B.; Oppong, K.; Petrone, M.; Saftoiu, A.; Puri, R.; Sahai, A.; Santo, E.; Sharma, M.; Soweid, A.; Sun, S.; Bun Teoh, A.; Vilmann, P.; Seifert, H.; Jenssen, C.
Thumbnail
Statistics
Statistics
Identifiers
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/15788
PMID: 31571619
ISSN: 2303-9027
Full record
Services
Services
RISMendeleyLinksolver
Files view or download
Files view or download
Date issued
2019
Journal title
Endoscopic ultrasound.
Type of content
Artigo
Abstract
In "What should be known prior to performing EUS exams, Part I," the authors discussed the need for clinical information and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking EUS examinations. Herewith, we present part II which addresses some (technical) controversies how EUS is performed and discuss from different points of view providing the relevant evidence as available. (1) Does equipment design influence the complication rate? (2) Should we have a standardized screen orientation? (3) Radial EUS versus longitudinal (linear) EUS. (4) Should we search for incidental findings using EUS?
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional