RUNA digital repository

    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • English 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  • Login
RUNABibliosaúdeXunta de galicia. Consellería de sanidadeServicio Galego de saúde
  • REPOSITORY
  • ABOUT US
    • About RUNA
    • Normative
    • Sergas Policy
  • HELP
    • Help
    • FAQ
  •   RUNA Home
  • Scientific publication
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review

RUIZ BAÑOBRE, JUAN; Kandimalla, R.; Goel, A.
Thumbnail
Statistics
Statistics
View Usage Statistics
Identifiers
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/15797
PMID: 32914007
DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00260
ISSN: 2473-4284
Full record
Services
Services
RISMendeleyLinksolver
Files view or download
Files view or download
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Mar 28;3:PO.18.00260 (808.8Kb)
Date issued
2019
Journal title
JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY
Type of content
Artigo
Abstract
PURPOSE: The development and use of predictive biomarkers to guide treatment decisions are paramount not only for improving survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but also for sparing them from unnecessary toxicity and reducing the economic burden of expensive treatments. We conducted a systematic review of published studies and evaluated the predictive biomarker landscape in the mCRC setting from a molecular and clinical viewpoint. METHODS: Studies analyzing predictive biomarkers for approved therapies in patients with mCRC were identified systematically using electronic databases. Preclinical studies and those providing no relevant information were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 173 studies comprising 148 biomarkers were selected for final analysis. Of all the biomarkers analyzed, 1.4% (two of 148) were explored in a prospective manner, whereas 98.6% (146 of 148) were evaluated in retrospective studies. Of the latter group, 78.8% (115 of 146) were not tested in subsequent phases, 9.6% (14 of 146) were tested in other retrospective cohorts, 8.9% (13 of 146) were retrospectively tested in at least one or more randomized cohorts, and only 2.7% (four of 146) were prospectively tested in a clinical trial. Finally, only 1.4% (two of 148) were validated sufficiently and are recognized as biomarkers for guiding treatment decision making in patients with mCRC. These markers were RAS mutational status for anti-EGFR antibodies and microsatellite instability status for anti-programmed cell death-1 drugs. CONCLUSION: Despite notable efforts to identify predictive biomarkers for various therapies used in the mCRC setting, because of a lack of data beyond retrospective studies and successful biomarker-driven approaches, only two molecular biomarkers have thus far found their translation into the clinic, highlighting the imperative need for implementing novel strategies and additional research in this clinically important field.

Browse

All of RUNACollectionsCentersAuthorsTitlesDeCSMeSHCIETypes of contentThis CollectionCentersAuthorsTitlesDeCSMeSHCIETypes of content

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

OF INTEREST

About Open AccessCopyright
TwitterRSS
Xunta de Galicia
© Xunta de Galicia. Información mantida e publicada na internet pola Consellería de Sanidade o Servizo Galego de Saúde
Legal warning | RSS
Galicia