Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRUIZ BAÑOBRE, JUAN 
dc.contributor.authorKandimalla, R.
dc.contributor.authorGoel, A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T08:59:25Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T08:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2473-4284
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446314/pdf/PO.18.00260.pdfes
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914007es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/15797
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The development and use of predictive biomarkers to guide treatment decisions are paramount not only for improving survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but also for sparing them from unnecessary toxicity and reducing the economic burden of expensive treatments. We conducted a systematic review of published studies and evaluated the predictive biomarker landscape in the mCRC setting from a molecular and clinical viewpoint. METHODS: Studies analyzing predictive biomarkers for approved therapies in patients with mCRC were identified systematically using electronic databases. Preclinical studies and those providing no relevant information were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 173 studies comprising 148 biomarkers were selected for final analysis. Of all the biomarkers analyzed, 1.4% (two of 148) were explored in a prospective manner, whereas 98.6% (146 of 148) were evaluated in retrospective studies. Of the latter group, 78.8% (115 of 146) were not tested in subsequent phases, 9.6% (14 of 146) were tested in other retrospective cohorts, 8.9% (13 of 146) were retrospectively tested in at least one or more randomized cohorts, and only 2.7% (four of 146) were prospectively tested in a clinical trial. Finally, only 1.4% (two of 148) were validated sufficiently and are recognized as biomarkers for guiding treatment decision making in patients with mCRC. These markers were RAS mutational status for anti-EGFR antibodies and microsatellite instability status for anti-programmed cell death-1 drugs. CONCLUSION: Despite notable efforts to identify predictive biomarkers for various therapies used in the mCRC setting, because of a lack of data beyond retrospective studies and successful biomarker-driven approaches, only two molecular biomarkers have thus far found their translation into the clinic, highlighting the imperative need for implementing novel strategies and additional research in this clinically important field.en
dc.language.isoenges
dc.titlePredictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic reviewes
dc.typeArtigoes
dc.authorsophosRuiz-Bañobre, J.
dc.authorsophosKandimalla, R.
dc.authorsophosGoel, A.
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/PO.18.00260
dc.identifier.pmid32914007
dc.identifier.sophos31843
dc.issue.number1es
dc.journal.titleJCO PRECISION ONCOLOGYes
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Estrutura de Xestión Integrada (EOXI)::EOXI de Ferrol – Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol::Oncoloxía médicaes
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Estrutura de Xestión Integrada (EOXI)::EOXI de Santiago de Compostela - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela::Oncoloxía médicaes
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoedAccesses
dc.subject.keywordCHUFes
dc.subject.keywordCHUSes
dc.typefidesArtículo de Revisiónes
dc.typesophosArtículo de Revisiónes
dc.volume.number3es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem