Risk of gastrointestinal cancer in a symptomatic cohort after a complete colonoscopy: Role of faecal immunochemical test.
Pin Vieito, Noel; Iglesias Varela, María José; Remedios Espino, David Rafael; Rodríguez-Alonso, Lorena; Rodriguez-Moranta, Francisco; Álvarez Sánchez, María Victoria; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando; Boadas, Jaume; Martínez-Bauer, Eva; Campo, Rafael; Bujanda, Luis; Ferrandez, Ángel; Piñol, Virginia; Rodríguez-Alcalde, Daniel; Guardiola, Jordi; Cubiella Fernández, Joaquín
Identifiers
Identifiers
Files view or download
Files view or download
Corporate author
The Colonpredict Study InvestigatorsDate issued
2020Journal title
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Type of content
Journal Article
DeCS
sensibilidad y especificidad | factores de riesgo | estudios prospectivos | colon | pruebas de valores predictivos | mediana edad | neoplasias gastrointestinales | síntomas | período postoperatorio | anciano | diagnóstico | humanos | colonoscopia | detección precoz del cáncer | modelos de riesgos proporcionalesMeSH
Risk Factors | Proportional Hazards Models | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms | Middle Aged | Colon | Sensitivity and Specificity | Colonoscopy | Postoperative Period | Early Detection of Cancer | Predictive Value of Tests | Humans | Diagnosis | Prospective Studies | AgedAbstract
BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been recommended to assess symptomatic patients for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. Nevertheless, some conditions could theoretically favour blood originating in proximal areas of the gastrointestinal tract passing through the colon unmetabolized. A positive FIT result could be related to other gastrointestinal cancers (GIC). AIM: To assess the risk of GIC detection and related death in FIT-positive symptomatic patients (threshold 10 mug Hb/g faeces) without CRC. METHODS: Post hoc cohort analysis performed within two prospective diagnostic test studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of different FIT analytical systems for CRC and significant colonic lesion detection. Ambulatory patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred consecutively for colonoscopy from primary and secondary healthcare, underwent a quantitative FIT before undergoing a complete colonoscopy. Patients without CRC were divided into two groups (positive and negative FIT) using the threshold of 10 mug Hb/g of faeces and data from follow-up were retrieved from electronic medical records of the public hospitals involved in the research. We determined the cumulative risk of GIC, CRC and upper GIC. Hazard rate (HR) was calculated adjusted by age, sex and presence of significant colonic lesion. RESULTS: We included 2709 patients without CRC and a complete baseline colonoscopy, 730 (26.9%) with FIT >/= 10 microgr Hb/gr. During a mean time of 45.5 +/- 20.0 mo, a GIC was detected in 57 (2.1%) patients: An upper GIC in 35 (1.3%) and a CRC in 14 (0.5%). Thirty-six patients (1.3%) died due to GIC: 22 (0.8%) due to an upper GIC and 9 (0.3%) due to CRC. FIT-positive subjects showed a higher CRC risk (HR 3.8, 95%CI: 1.2-11.9) with no differences in GIC (HR 1.5, 95%CI: 0.8-2.7) or upper GIC risk (HR 1.0, 95%CI: 0.5-2.2). Patients with a positive FIT had only an increased risk of CRC-related death (HR 10.8, 95%CI: 2.1-57.1) and GIC-related death (HR 2.2, 95%CI: 1.1-4.3), with no differences in upper GIC-related death (HR 1.4, 95%CI: 0.6-3.3). An upper GIC was detected in 22 (0.8%) patients during the first year. Two variables were independently associated: anaemia (OR 5.6, 95%CI: 2.2-13.9) and age >/= 70 years (OR 2.7, 95%CI: 1.1-7.0). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients without CRC have a moderate risk increase in upper GIC, regardless of the FIT result. Patients with a positive FIT have an increased risk of post-colonoscopy CRC.