Predictors of low-level HIV viraemia and virological failure in the era of integrase inhibitors: A Spanish nationwide cohort.

Identifiers
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/19784
PMID: 35234328
DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13265
ISSN: 1464-2662
ESSN: 1468-1293
Date issued
2022-09Journal title
HIV medicine
Type of content
Artigo
DeCS
viremia | infecciones por VIH | antirretrovirales | humanos | medicina interna | fármacos anti-VIH | ARN | VIH | VIH-1 | adulto | inhibidores de la integrasa | inhibidores de la integrasa del VIH | enfermedades transmisibles | carga viral | inhibidores de transcriptasa inversaMeSH
Viral Load | Spain | Adult | Anti-Retroviral Agents | Humans | Anti-HIV Agents | HIV | Internal Medicine | HIV Infections | RNA | Viremia | Communicable Diseases | HIV-1 | Integrase Inhibitors | HIV Integrase Inhibitors | Reverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAbstract
To pinpoint factors associated with low-level viraemia (LLV) and virological failure (VF) in people living with HIV in the era of high-efficacy antiretroviral treatment (ART) and widespread use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTIs)-based ART.
We included adults aged > 18 years starting their first ART between 2015 and 2018 in the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network National Cohort (CoRIS). Low-level viraemia was defined as plasma viral load (pVL) of 50-199 copies/mL at weeks 48 and 72 and VF was defined as pVL ≥ 50 copies/mL at week 48 and pVL ≥ 200 copies/mL at week 72. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the impact on LLV and VF of baseline CD4 T-cell count, CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio and pVL, initial ART classes, age at ART initiation, time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation, gender and transmission route.
Out of 4186 participants, 3120 (76.0%) started INSTIs, 455 (11.1%) started boosted protease inhibitors (bPIs) and 443 (10.8%) started nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), either of them with two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Low-level viraemia was met in 2.5% of participants and VF in 4.3%. There were no significant differences throughout the years for both virological outcomes. Baseline HIV-1 RNA > 5 log10 copies/mL was the only consistent predictor of higher risk of LLV [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-48.3] and VF (aOR = 5.4, 95% CI: 1.9-15.1), even in participants treated with INSTIs.
The rates of LLV and VF were low but remained steady throughout the years. Baseline HIV-1 RNA > 5 log10 copies/mL showed a persistent association with LLV and VF even in participants receiving INSTIs.
