ABCDE approach to victims by lifeguards: How do they manage a critical patient? A cross sectional simulation study

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Decision-making in emergencies is a multifactorial process based on the rescuer, patient, setting and resources. The eye-tracking system is a proven method for assessing decision-making processes that have been used in different fields of science. Our aim was to evaluate the lifeguards' capacity to perform the ABCDE (Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability-Exposure) approach when facing a simulated critically ill-drowned victim. METHODS: A cross-sectional simulation study was designed to assess the skills and sequence of the ABCDE approach by 20 professional lifeguards. They had to assess a victim and act according to his/her clinical status by following the ABCDE primary assessment approach. The two kinds of variables were recorder: those related to the quality of each step of the ABCDE approach and the visual behaviour using a portable eye-movement system. The eye-tracking system was the Mobile Eye system (Bedford, USA). RESULTS: None of the study participants were able to complete correctly the ABCDE approach. Lifeguards spent more time in the Circulation step: Airway (15.5+/-11.1 s), Breathing (25.1+/-21.1 s), Circulation (44.6+/-29.5 s), Disability (38.5+/-0.7 s). Participants spent more time in viewpoints considered as important (65.5+/-17.4 s) compared with secondary ones (34.6+/-17.4 s, p = 0.008). This was also represented in the percentage of visual fixations (fixations in important viewpoints: 63.36+/-15.06; fixation in secondary viewpoints: 36.64+/-15.06; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Professional lifeguards failed to fully perform the ABCDE sequence. Evaluation by experts with the help of eye-tracking technology detected the lifeguards' limitations in the assessment and treatment of an eventual critically ill victim. Such deficits should be considered in the design and implementation of lifeguards' training programmes.