A phase 2 study of panitumumab with irinotecan as salvage therapy in chemorefractory KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients
Elez, Elena; Pericay, Carles; Valladares Ayerbes, Manuel; Bando, Inmaculada; Safont, Maria Jose; Gallego, Javier; Gravalos, Cristina; Arrivi, Antonio; Carrato, Alfredo; Conde, Veronica; Ortiz, Maria Jose; Lopez, Carlos; Alonso, Beatriz; Ruiz de Mena, Inmaculada; Diaz-Rubio, Eduardo; Tabernero, Josep; Aranda, Enrique
Identificadores
Identificadores
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Visualización ou descarga de ficheiros
Data de publicación
2019Título da revista
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Tipo de contido
Artigo
DeCS
resultado del tratamiento | diarrea | GTP fosfohidrolasas | tasa de supervivencia | ganglios linfáticos | mediana edad | tratamiento de última línea | adulto | desequilibrio hidroelectrolítico | magnesio | erupciones por medicamentos | proteínas protooncogénicas p21(ras) | protocolos de quimioterapia antineoplásica combinada | anciano | proteínas de membranas | neoplasias peritoneales | humanos | PTEN fosfohidrolasa | neoplasias hepáticas | neoplasias pulmonares | astenia | proteínas protooncogénicas B-raf | adenocarcinoma | neoplasias colorrectalesMeSH
Membrane Proteins | Adult | Peritoneal Neoplasms | Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf | Middle Aged | GTP Phosphohydrolases | Adenocarcinoma | Lymph Nodes | Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) | Survival Rate | Drug Eruptions | Magnesium | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | Diarrhea | Lung Neoplasms | Humans | Treatment Outcome | Asthenia | Water-Electrolyte Imbalance | Liver Neoplasms | Salvage Therapy | Aged | Colorectal Neoplasms | PTEN PhosphohydrolaseResumo
BACKGROUND: Targeted agents are standard treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the first- and second-line settings. This phase 2 study determined the benefit of targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with panitumumab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory patients. METHODS: KRAS exon-2 wild-type patients failing prior irinotecan received panitumumab (6 mg/kg) and irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). KRAS exon-2 status was evaluated centrally, along with NRAS, BRAF mutations, epiregulin, amphiregulin, PTEN and EGFR copy number status, and correlated with efficacy. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were treated. Among the 46 wild-type RAS patients, the ORR was 15.2% (seven partial responses), with median PFS of 3.8 months (95% CI 2.7-4.3) and median OS of 12.5 months (95% CI 6.7-15.9). Wild-type BRAF patients showed a 13.0% response rate. No significant correlations between response and baseline biomarker expression were identified. Common grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhoea and rash (18.0% each), hypomagnesaemia and asthenia (8.2% each). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of panitumumab to irinotecan as salvage therapy is feasible but has limited activity in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. No biomarkers predictive of response were identified.