Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorTo, Fergus
dc.contributor.authorVentín Rodríguez, Clara
dc.contributor.authorElkhalifa, Shuayb
dc.contributor.authorLilleker, James B
dc.contributor.authorChinoy, Hector
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T08:18:39Z
dc.date.available2022-03-17T08:18:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2520-1026
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699830es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/16297
dc.description.abstractBackground: Line blot immunoassays (LIA) for myositis-specific (MSA) and myositis-associated (MAA) autoantibodies have become commercially available. In the largest study of this kind, we evaluated the clinical performance of a widely used LIA for MSAs and MAAs. Methods: Adults tested for MSA/MAA by LIA at a tertiary myositis centre (January 2016-July 2018) were identified. According to expert-defined diagnoses, true and false positive rates were calculated for strongly and weakly positive autoantibody results within three cohorts: idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), connective tissue disease (CTD) without myositis, and non-CTD/IIM. Factors associated with true positivity were determined. Results: We analysed 342 cases. 67 (19.6%) had IIM, in whom 71 autoantibodies were detected (50 strong positives [70.4%], 21 weak positives [29.6%]). Of the strong positives, 48/50 (96.0%; 19 MSAs, 29 MAAs) were deemed true positives. Of the weak positives, 15/21 (71.4%; 3 MSAs, 12 MAAs) were deemed true positives.In CTD without myositis cases (n = 120), 31/61 (51.0%; 5 MSAs, 26 MAAs) autoantibodies were strongly positive, with 24/31 (77.4%; 0 MSAs, 24 MAAs) true positives. 30/61 (49.2%; 13 MSAs, 17 MAAs) were weakly positive, with 16/30 (53.3%; 0 MSAs, 16 MAAs) true positives. In non-CTD/IIM cases (n = 155), all 24 MSAs and 22 MAAs were false positives; these results included 17 (37.0%; 7 MSAs, 10 MAAs) strong positives.Individual autoantibody specificities were > 98.2 and > 97.5% for weakly and strongly positive results, respectively. True positivity was associated with high pre-test for IIM (odds ratio 50.8, 95% CI 13.7-189.2, p < 0.001) and strong positive (versus weak positive) results (4.4, 2.3-8.3, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We demonstrated the high specificity of a myositis LIA in a clinical setting. However, a significant burden of false positive results was evident in those with a low pre-test likelihood of IIM and for weakly positive autoantibodies.en
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleLine blot immunoassays in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: retrospective review of diagnostic accuracy and factors predicting true positive resultsen
dc.typeJournal Articlees
dc.authorsophosTo, Fergus;Ventín-Rodríguez, Clara;Elkhalifa, Shuayb;Lilleker, James B;Chinoy, Hector
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41927-020-00132-9
dc.identifier.pmid32699830
dc.identifier.sophos36299
dc.journal.titleBMC rheumatologyes
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Estrutura de Xestión Integrada (EOXI)::EOXI de A Coruña - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña::Reumatoloxíaes
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subject.keywordCHUACes
dc.typefidesArtículo Originales
dc.typesophosArtículo Originales
dc.volume.number4.es


Ficheiros no ítem

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese comoAtribución 4.0 Internacional