Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTo, Fergus
dc.contributor.authorVentín Rodríguez, Clara
dc.contributor.authorElkhalifa, Shuayb
dc.contributor.authorLilleker, James B
dc.contributor.authorChinoy, Hector
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T08:18:39Z
dc.date.available2022-03-17T08:18:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2520-1026
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699830es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/16297
dc.description.abstractBackground: Line blot immunoassays (LIA) for myositis-specific (MSA) and myositis-associated (MAA) autoantibodies have become commercially available. In the largest study of this kind, we evaluated the clinical performance of a widely used LIA for MSAs and MAAs. Methods: Adults tested for MSA/MAA by LIA at a tertiary myositis centre (January 2016-July 2018) were identified. According to expert-defined diagnoses, true and false positive rates were calculated for strongly and weakly positive autoantibody results within three cohorts: idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), connective tissue disease (CTD) without myositis, and non-CTD/IIM. Factors associated with true positivity were determined. Results: We analysed 342 cases. 67 (19.6%) had IIM, in whom 71 autoantibodies were detected (50 strong positives [70.4%], 21 weak positives [29.6%]). Of the strong positives, 48/50 (96.0%; 19 MSAs, 29 MAAs) were deemed true positives. Of the weak positives, 15/21 (71.4%; 3 MSAs, 12 MAAs) were deemed true positives.In CTD without myositis cases (n = 120), 31/61 (51.0%; 5 MSAs, 26 MAAs) autoantibodies were strongly positive, with 24/31 (77.4%; 0 MSAs, 24 MAAs) true positives. 30/61 (49.2%; 13 MSAs, 17 MAAs) were weakly positive, with 16/30 (53.3%; 0 MSAs, 16 MAAs) true positives. In non-CTD/IIM cases (n = 155), all 24 MSAs and 22 MAAs were false positives; these results included 17 (37.0%; 7 MSAs, 10 MAAs) strong positives.Individual autoantibody specificities were > 98.2 and > 97.5% for weakly and strongly positive results, respectively. True positivity was associated with high pre-test for IIM (odds ratio 50.8, 95% CI 13.7-189.2, p < 0.001) and strong positive (versus weak positive) results (4.4, 2.3-8.3, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We demonstrated the high specificity of a myositis LIA in a clinical setting. However, a significant burden of false positive results was evident in those with a low pre-test likelihood of IIM and for weakly positive autoantibodies.en
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleLine blot immunoassays in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: retrospective review of diagnostic accuracy and factors predicting true positive resultsen
dc.typeJournal Articlees
dc.authorsophosTo, Fergus;Ventín-Rodríguez, Clara;Elkhalifa, Shuayb;Lilleker, James B;Chinoy, Hector
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41927-020-00132-9
dc.identifier.pmid32699830
dc.identifier.sophos36299
dc.journal.titleBMC rheumatologyes
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Estrutura de Xestión Integrada (EOXI)::EOXI de A Coruña - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña::Reumatoloxíaes
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subject.keywordCHUACes
dc.typefidesArtículo Originales
dc.typesophosArtículo Originales
dc.volume.number4.es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional