Predictive Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Symptomatic Patients without Colorectal Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis within the COLONPREDICT Cohort
Pin Vieito, noel; Iglesias Varela, María José; Remedios Espino, David Rafael; Álvarez Sánchez, María Victoria; Fernández-Bañares, F.; Boadas, J.; Martínez-Bauer, E.; Campo, R.; Bujanda, L.; Ferrández, Á; Piñol, V.; Rodríguez-Alcalde, D.; Menendez Rodriguez, Martin; Garcia Morales, Natalia; Pérez Mosquera, Cristina; Cubiella Fernández, Joaquín
Identificadores
Identificadores
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Fecha de publicación
2020Título de revista
Diagnostics (Basel)
Tipo de contenido
Journal Article
Resumen
We aimed to assess the risk of cancer in patients with abdominal symptoms after a complete colonoscopy without colorectal cancer (CRC), according to the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration, as well as its diagnostic accuracy. For this purpose, we performed a post-hoc analysis within a cohort of 1431 patients from the COLONPREDICT study, prospectively designed to assess the fecal immunochemical test accuracy in detecting CRC. Over 36.5 +/- 8.4 months, cancer was detected in 115 (8%) patients. Patients with CEA values higher than 3 ng/mL revealed an increased risk of cancer (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1), CRC (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1-17.7) and non-gastrointestinal cancer (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8). A new malignancy was detected in 51 (3.6%) patients during the first year and three variables were independently associated: anemia (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.8), rectal bleeding (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7) and CEA level >3 ng/mL (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-7.1). However, CEA was increased only in 31.8% (95% CI, 16.4-52.7%) and 50% (95% CI, 25.4-74.6%) of patients with and without anemia, respectively, who would be diagnosed with cancer during the first year of follow-up. On the basis of this information, CEA should not be used to assist in the triage of patients presenting with lower bowel symptoms who have recently been ruled out a CRC.