Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorIñiguez Romo, Andres 
dc.contributor.authorChevalier, B.
dc.contributor.authorRichardt, G.
dc.contributor.authorNeylon, A.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Díaz, Victor Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorKornowski, R.
dc.contributor.authorCarrie, D.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, R.
dc.contributor.authorBarbato, E.
dc.contributor.authorSerra-Peñaranda, A.
dc.contributor.authorGuiducci, V.
dc.contributor.authorValdés-Chávarri, M.
dc.contributor.authorYajima, J.
dc.contributor.authorWijns, W.
dc.contributor.authorSaito, S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T12:13:15Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T12:13:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033154es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/16816
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer (BP-SES; Ultimaster), in comparison to a benchmark everolimus-eluting, permanent polymer stent (PP-EES; Xience), in a prespecified subgroup of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) enrolled in the CENTURY II trial. BACKGROUND: The use of coronary stenting in high-risk subgroups, like MVD patients, is rising. The clinical evidence, including long-term comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety benefits of different new-generation drug eluting stents, however, remains insufficient. METHODS: Among 1,119 patients (intention-to-treat) enrolled in the CENTURY II prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial, a prespecified subgroup of 456 MVD patients were allocated by stratified randomization to treatment with BP-SES (n = 225) or PP-EES (n = 231). The previously reported primary endpoint of this study was freedom from target lesion failure (TLF: a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction [MI] and clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization) at 9 months. RESULTS: In this MVD substudy, baseline patient, lesion and procedure characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. At 1 and 5 years, both BP-SES and PP-EES displayed low and comparable rates of TLF (5.3 vs. 7.8%; p = .29 and 10.2 vs. 13.4%; p = .29), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4 vs. 1.3%; p = .33 and 0.9 vs. 1.7%; p = .43), respectively. Composite endpoint of cardiac death and MI, and patient-oriented composite endpoint of any death, MI, and coronary revascularizations were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm good long-term safety and efficacy of the studied bioresorbable polymer stent in this high-risk patient population.en
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors*
dc.subject.meshSingle-Blind Method*
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged*
dc.subject.meshCoronary Stenosis*
dc.subject.meshProsthesis Design*
dc.subject.meshPolymers*
dc.subject.meshPercutaneous Coronary Intervention*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome*
dc.subject.meshTime Factors*
dc.subject.meshRepublic of Korea*
dc.subject.meshSirolimus*
dc.subject.meshCoronary Artery Disease*
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies*
dc.subject.meshCardiovascular Agents*
dc.subject.meshAged*
dc.titleComparison of long-term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 5-year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trialen
dc.typeJournal Articlees
dc.authorsophosIñiguez, A.;Chevalier, B.;Richardt, G.;Neylon, A.;Jiménez, V. A.;Kornowski, R.;Carrie, D.;Moreno, R.;Barbato, E.;Serra-Peñaranda, A.;Guiducci, V.;Valdés-Chávarri, M.;Yajima, J.;Wijns, W.;Saito, S.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.28224
dc.identifier.pmid31033154
dc.identifier.sophos41277
dc.issue.number2es
dc.journal.titleCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONSes
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Estrutura de Xestión Integrada (EOXI)::EOXI de Vigo - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo::Cardioloxíaes
dc.page.initial175es
dc.page.final184 -es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subject.decsresultado del tratamiento*
dc.subject.decspolímeros*
dc.subject.decsfármacos cardiovasculares*
dc.subject.decsestudios prospectivos*
dc.subject.decsfactores de riesgo*
dc.subject.decsdiseño de prótesis*
dc.subject.decsmediana edad*
dc.subject.decssirolimus*
dc.subject.decsanciano*
dc.subject.decsmétodo simple ciego*
dc.subject.decshumanos*
dc.subject.decsfactores de tiempo*
dc.subject.decsenfermedad arterial coronaria*
dc.subject.decsestenosis coronaria*
dc.subject.decscirugía coronaria percutánea*
dc.subject.decsRepública de Corea*
dc.subject.keywordCHUVIes
dc.typefidesArtículo Originales
dc.typesophosArtículo Originales
dc.volume.number95es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional