Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLiñares-Blanco, Jose
dc.contributor.authorPAZOS SIERRA, ALEJANDRO
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Lozano, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-31T10:13:41Z
dc.date.available2022-12-31T10:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2376-5992
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322589es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/17179
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, machine learning (ML) researchers have changed their focus towards biological problems that are difficult to analyse with standard approaches. Large initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) have allowed the use of omic data for the training of these algorithms. In order to study the state of the art, this review is provided to cover the main works that have used ML with TCGA data. Firstly, the principal discoveries made by the TCGA consortium are presented. Once these bases have been established, we begin with the main objective of this study, the identification and discussion of those works that have used the TCGA data for the training of different ML approaches. After a review of more than 100 different papers, it has been possible to make a classification according to following three pillars: the type of tumour, the type of algorithm and the predicted biological problem. One of the conclusions drawn in this work shows a high density of studies based on two major algorithms: Random Forest and Support Vector Machines. We also observe the rise in the use of deep artificial neural networks. It is worth emphasizing, the increase of integrative models of multi-omic data analysis. The different biological conditions are a consequence of molecular homeostasis, driven by both protein coding regions, regulatory elements and the surrounding environment. It is notable that a large number of works make use of genetic expression data, which has been found to be the preferred method by researchers when training the different models. The biological problems addressed have been classified into five types: prognosis prediction, tumour subtypes, microsatellite instability (MSI), immunological aspects and certain pathways of interest. A clear trend was detected in the prediction of these conditions according to the type of tumour. That is the reason for which a greater number of works have focused on the BRCA cohort, while specific works for survival, for example, were centred on the GBM cohort, due to its large number of events. Throughout this review, it will be possible to go in depth into the works and the methodologies used to study TCGA cancer data. Finally, it is intended that this work will serve as a basis for future research in this field of study.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMachine learning analysis of TCGA cancer dataen
dc.typeJournal Articlees
dc.authorsophosLiñares-Blanco, Jose;Pazos, Alejandro;Fernandez-Lozano, Carlos
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj-cs.584
dc.identifier.sophos46050
dc.issue.number7es
dc.journal.titlePeerJ Computer sciencees
dc.organizationSERGAS::Área Sanitaria de A Coruña e Cee::INIBIC.- Instituto de Investigación Biomédicaes
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subject.keywordINIBICes
dc.typefidesArtículo Originales
dc.typesophosArtículo Originales


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional