Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Sotelo, J.
dc.contributor.authorPinteno-Blanco, M.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ramos, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorCadavid-Torres, M. I.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T10:02:10Z
dc.date.available2024-01-02T10:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0212-6567
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488034es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/18432
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led systematic review of medications on: potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), health outcomes and costs. DESIGN: Prospective, open, controlled and cluster-randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Six primary care clinics from Balearic Islands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two clusters (21 per group), and 549 patients aged >/=65 years and >/=5 chronic medications were included; of which 277 were allocated to Intervention Group (IG) and 272 to Control Group (CG). Patients were excluded if they were: institutionalized, temporarily displaced, routinely monitored under private healthcare, or home care. INTERVENTION: PIM detection by the pharmacist using a combination of explicit and implicit methods; and communication of the most appropriate therapeutic strategies to the physician. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients with PIM and mean number of PIM/patient (main outcomes); and morbidity, mortality, and costs (secondary outcomes) were assessed. STATISTICAL PLAN: Following an intention-to-treat approach, quantitative and qualitative outcomes variables were compared by T-Student and Chi-square tests, respectively. Results were providing as difference in proportions for qualitative outcomes and difference in means for quantitative outcomes with respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: After intervention, proportion of patients with PIM decreased by 13.7% (95% CI: 9.3; 18.2) more in IG than CG. Mean number of PIM/patient and mean cost of PIM/patient decreased by 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32; 0.54) and 72.11euro (95% CI: 26.15; 118.06) more in IG than CG, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in morbidity, mortality or costs of healthcare resources. CONCLUSIONS: PIM detection and recommendations provided by pharmacist could contribute to reduce significantly PIM and drug expenditure; but without reaching statistically significant differences in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resources costs.
dc.language.isoes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleAdecuación de la prescripción en pacientes mayores polimedicados en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado por grupos PHARM-PC
dc.typeJournal Articlees
dc.authorsophosMartinez-Sotelo, J.;Pinteno-Blanco, M.;Garcia-Ramos, R.;Cadavid-Torres, M. I.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102124
dc.identifier.pmid34488034
dc.identifier.sophos44830
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titleAtencion Primaria
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.)::Área Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela::Farmacia
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subject.keywordCHUSes
dc.typefidesArtículo Científico (incluye Original, Original breve, Revisión Sistemática y Meta-análisis)es
dc.typesophosArtículo Originales
dc.volume.number53


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International