A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial to explore the effects of a GABAA-?5 NAM (basmisanil) on intellectual disability associated with Down syndrome
Goeldner, C.; Kishnani, P.S.; Skotko, B.G.; Casero, J.L.; Hipp, J.F.; Derks, M.; Hernandez, M.-C.; Khwaja, O.; Lennon-Chrimes, S.; Noeldeke, J.; Pellicer, S.; Squassante, L.; Visootsak, J.; Wandel, C.; Fontoura, P.; d'Ardhuy, X.L.; De La Torre Fornell, R.; Glue, P.; Hoover-Fong, J.; Uhlmann, S.; Malagón Valdez, J.; Marshall, A.; Martinón Torres, Federico; Redondo Collazo, Lorenzo; Rodriguez-Tenreiro, C.; Marquez Chin, V.; Michel Reynoso, A.G.; Mitchell, E.A.; Slykerman, R.F.; Wouldes, T.; Loveday, S.; Moldenhauer, F.; Novell, R.; Ochoa, C.; Rafii, M.S.; Rebillat, A.-S.; Sanlaville, D.; Sarda, P.; Shankar, R.; Pulsifer, M.; Evans, C.L.; Silva, A.M.; McDonough, M.E.; Stanley, M.; McCary, L.M.; Vicari, S.; Wilcox, W.; Zampino, G.; Zuddas, A.

Identificadores
Identificadores
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Fecha de publicación
2022Título de revista
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Tipo de contenido
Article
Resumen
Background: There are currently no pharmacological therapies to address the intellectual disability associated with Down syndrome. Excitatory/inhibitory imbalance has been hypothesized to contribute to impairments in cognitive functioning in Down syndrome. Negative modulation of the GABAA-?5 receptor is proposed as a mechanism to attenuate GABAergic function and restore the excitatory/inhibitory balance. Methods: Basmisanil, a selective GABAA-?5 negative allosteric modulator, was evaluated at 120 mg or 240 mg BID (80 or 160 mg for 12-13 years) in a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial (Clematis) for efficacy and safety in adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome. The primary endpoint was based on a composite analysis of working memory (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Scale [RBANS]) and independent functioning and adaptive behavior (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales [VABS-II] or the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I]). Secondary measures included the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Preschool (BRIEF-P), Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-4), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds-QL). EEG was conducted for safety monitoring and quantitatively analyzed in adolescents. Results: Basmisanil was safe and well-tolerated; the frequency and nature of adverse events were similar in basmisanil and placebo arms. EEG revealed treatment-related changes in spectral power (increase in low ~ 4-Hz and decrease in high ~ 20-Hz frequencies) providing evidence of functional target engagement. All treatment arms had a similar proportion of participants showing above-threshold improvement on the primary composite endpoint, evaluating concomitant responses in cognition and independent functioning (29% in placebo, 20% in low dose, and 25% in high dose). Further analysis of the individual measures contributing to the primary endpoint revealed no difference between placebo and basmisanil-treated groups in either adolescents or adults. There were also no differences across the secondary endpoints assessing changes in executive function, language, or quality of life. Conclusions: Basmisanil did not meet the primary efficacy objective of concomitant improvement on cognition and adaptive functioning after 6 months of treatment, despite evidence for target engagement. This study provides key learnings for future clinical trials in Down syndrome. Trial registration: The study was registered on December 31, 2013, at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02024789.
