Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBarcala-Furelos, R.*
dc.contributor.authorAranda-García, S.*
dc.contributor.authorOtero-Agra, M.*
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Méndez, F.*
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Calvete, A.*
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Isasi, Santiago*
dc.contributor.authorGreif, R.*
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Núñez, Antonio *
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T09:15:06Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T09:15:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBarcala-Furelos R, Aranda-García S, Otero-Agra M, Fernández-Méndez F, Alonso-Calvete A, Martínez-Isasi S, et al. Are smart glasses feasible for dispatch prehospital assistance during on-boat cardiac arrest? A pilot simulation study with fishermen. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2023;18(5):1551-9.
dc.identifier.issn1970-9366
dc.identifier.otherhttps://portalcientifico.sergas.gal//documentos/643af5fb1656ab66db7df1de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/21098
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to explore feasibility of basic life support (BLS) guided through smart glasses (SGs) when assisting fishermen bystanders. Twelve participants assisted a simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on a fishing boat assisted by the dispatcher through the SGs. The SGs were connected to make video calls. Feasibility was assessed whether or not they needed help from the dispatcher. BLS-AED steps, time to first shock/compression, and CPR's quality (hands-only) during 2 consecutive minutes (1st minute without dispatcher feedback, 2nd with dispatcher feedback) were analyzed. Reliability was analyzed by comparing the assessment of variables performed by the dispatcher through SGs with those registered by an on-scene instructor. Assistance through SGs was needed in 72% of the BLS steps, which enabled all participants to perform the ABC approach and use AED correctly. Feasibility was proven that dispatcher's feedback through SGs helped to improve bystanders' performance, as after dispatcher gave feedback via SGs, only 3% of skills were incorrect. Comparison of on-scene instructor vs. SGs assessment by dispatcher differ in 8% of the analyzed skills: greatest difference in the "incorrect hand position during CPR" (on-scene: 33% vs. dispatcher: 0%). When comparing the 1st minute with 2nd minute, there were only significant differences in the percentage of compressions with correct depth (1st:48 ± 42%, 2nd:70 ± 31, p = 0.02). Using SGs in aquatic settings is feasible and improves BLS. CPR quality markers were similar with and without SG. These devices have great potential for communication between dispatchers and laypersons but need more development to be used in real emergencies.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This research did not receive any specific financial support from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshCardiopulmonary Resuscitation *
dc.subject.meshSmart Glasses *
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results *
dc.subject.meshShips *
dc.subject.meshEmergency Medical Service Communication Systems *
dc.subject.meshOut-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest *
dc.titleAre smart glasses feasible for dispatch prehospital assistance during on-boat cardiac arrest? A pilot simulation study with fishermen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.authorsophosBarcala-Furelos, R.; Aranda-García, S.; Otero-Agra, M.; Fernández-Méndez, F.; Alonso-Calvete, A.; Martínez-Isasi, S.; Greif, R.; Rodríguez-Núñez, A.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11739-023-03251-6
dc.identifier.sophos643af5fb1656ab66db7df1de
dc.issue.number5
dc.journal.titleInternal and Emergency Medicine*
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Atención Primaria A Coruña::Unidades de enfermaría
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Áreas Sanitarias (A.S.) - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago::Pediatría
dc.page.initial1551
dc.page.final1559
dc.relation.projectIDCRUE-CSIC agreement
dc.relation.projectIDSpringer Nature
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03251-6
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess*
dc.subject.keywordAS A Coruña
dc.subject.keywordAS Coruña AP
dc.subject.keywordAS Santiago
dc.subject.keywordCHUS
dc.typefidesArtículo Científico (incluye Original, Original breve, Revisión Sistemática y Meta-análisis)
dc.typesophosArtículo Original
dc.volume.number18


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)