Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTriñanes Pego, Yolanda 
dc.contributor.authorGómez Salgado, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorFaraldo Vallés, María José
dc.contributor.authorPérez Ríos, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorRuano Raviña, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorVarela Lema, Leonor 
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-17T10:49:41Z
dc.date.available2025-12-17T10:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-14
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care/article/op149-how-to-improve-the-impact-of-health-technology-assessment-stakeholders-perspectives-in-spain/845880384B11B960E0D654071603C1DFes
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care/issue/27E56FEB84AC12779B557151063ACD7Fes
dc.identifier.otherhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570116/es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/22268
dc.description.abstract[EN] Introduction: Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies in Spain have an important role in informing decisions about the introduction and use of health technologies in the Spanish National Health System. However, although different approaches have been taken to measure and improve their impact, no study to date has explored the perceived impact of HTA products at the national level. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of macro-, meso-, and micro-level decision makers on how to improve the impact of HTA. Methods: Three online focus groups were conducted with policy makers, healthcare managers, clinicians, and patients. The transcripts were evaluated using a deductive thematic analysis based on a multidimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact. Results: Four key themes were identified: (i) Timeliness and use of HTA assessments: Although the quality of the reports was recognized, the time taken for the elaboration and extension of reports negatively affected their use. Participants considered that reports should be tailored to the needs of end users (e.g., briefer versions available for meso-and micro-level use); (ii) Effective engagement and external communications: The engagement of multiple stakeholders (policy makers, manufacturers, clinicians, and patients) in the elaboration process was considered crucial to improve HTA impact and ensure adequate communication of results; (iii) Good institutional reputation and fit within the healthcare and policy making system: Stakeholders agreed on the need to strengthen collaboration at the national level and increase public understanding of the value of HTA and its use in healthcare decision-making; and (iv) Effective implementation of policy change regarding health technologies: Stakeholders were very receptive to the results and recommendations of HTA reports when new technologies are demanded, but the identification and selection process should be improved to guarantee that these reports are available on time. Conclusions: This study has identified different proposals and mechanisms that could improve the impact of HTA in Spain.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.subject.meshStakeholder Participation *
dc.titleHow To Improve The Impact Of Health Technology Assessment: Stakeholders’ Perspectives In Spaines
dc.title.alternativeOP149 How To Improve The Impact Of Health Technology Assessment: Stakeholders’ Perspectives In Spaines
dc.typePublicación de congresoes
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s), 2023es
dc.event.titleHTAi 2023 Meeting in Adelaide, Australiaes
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462323001484
dc.identifier.pmidPMC11570116
dc.organizationServizo Galego de Saúde::Xerencia do Servizo Galego de Saúde::Axencia Galega para a Xestión do Coñecemento en Saúdees
dc.place.realizationAdelaide, Australiaes
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordAvalia-tes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record