What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II)
Dietrich, C.; Arcidiacono, P.; Braden, B.; Burmeister, S.; Carrara, S.; Cui, X.; Leo, M.; Dong, Y.; Fusaroli, P.; Gottschalk, U.; Healey, A.; Hocke, M.; Hollerbach, S.; Iglesias García, Julio; Ignee, A.; Jürgensen, C.; Kahaleh, M.; Kitano, M.; Kunda, R.; Larghi, A.; Möller, K.; Napoleon, B.; Oppong, K.; Petrone, M.; Saftoiu, A.; Puri, R.; Sahai, A.; Santo, E.; Sharma, M.; Soweid, A.; Sun, S.; Bun Teoh, A.; Vilmann, P.; Seifert, H.; Jenssen, C.
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2//images/thumbnails/thumn_cientif.png)
Identificadores![](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2//images/despl_identif.png)
Identificadores
Visualización o descarga de ficheros![](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2//images/despl_contenidos.png)
Visualización o descarga de ficheros
Fecha de publicación
2019Título de revista
Endoscopic ultrasound.
Tipo de contenido
Artigo
Resumen
In "What should be known prior to performing EUS exams, Part I," the authors discussed the need for clinical information and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking EUS examinations. Herewith, we present part II which addresses some (technical) controversies how EUS is performed and discuss from different points of view providing the relevant evidence as available. (1) Does equipment design influence the complication rate? (2) Should we have a standardized screen orientation? (3) Radial EUS versus longitudinal (linear) EUS. (4) Should we search for incidental findings using EUS?
![](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2//images/final_lines.png)